Legal Opinion

Jane Doe v. Roy Black

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 18, 2014No. 13-12923PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRYOR, Circuit Judge:

This appeal requires us to decide two issues: whether we have jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal by criminal defense attorneys and their client who intervened in a proceeding ancillary to a criminal investigation to claim a privilege that would prevent the disclosure of their plea negotiations; and, if so, whether a privilege bars crime victims from discovering plea negotiations. The United States investigated Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse of minors, but failed to confer with the victims before entering a non-prosecution agreement with Epstein. Two victims filed…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. Sanmina CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Richard Jordan v. Georgia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  3. Yellow Pages Photos, Inc. v. Yellow Pages Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  4. Drummond Company, Inc. v. Conrad & Scherer, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  5. In re: Courtney WildCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API