Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Gentry

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1936No. 4128PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKLEY, Justice.

Elliott being the owner of lands, sued to evict Gentry, his tenant, from the possession thereof, and prevailed. Gentry appealed. During the existence of the relation, Elliott and Gentry signed a cotton acreage reduction contract with the secretary of agriculture, covering the Elliott farm. This contract is primarily between the owner Elliott, referred to therein as the “producer” and the secretary' of agriculture. It covers 1934 and also 1935 at the option of the secretary. A certain acreage representing the reduced acreage ordinarily planted to cotton is thereby rented to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Powell v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Donahoe v. RichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Rees v. Emmons Coal Mining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. F. B. Norman Co. v. E. I. duPont deNemours & Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1920
  5. National Union Building Ass'n v. BrewerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Herring v. Volume Merchandise, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. Mesilla Valley Mall Co. v. Crown IndustriesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Noce v. StemenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Iest v. GartinIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API