Legal Opinion

Noce v. Stemen

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1966No. 8005PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■ OPINION

COMPTON,'Justice.

Plaintiffs brought this action against the defendants to recover rents allegedly due under a written lease, and for damages to the leased 'premises. The' defendants defended on the ground -that the lease had been terminated by operation of law. The trial judge found that plaintiffs were entitled to recover the rentals due and damages for injury to the premises. Judgment was entered accordingly and the defendants appeal.

The sole question is whether there was a surrender and acceptance of the leased premises by act and operation of law. There is no appeal from the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. NelsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Armijo v. PettitNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Rauth v. DennisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Elliott v. GentryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Riggs v. MurdockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. Coffin v. FowlerAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Mariani Air Products Company v. Gill's Tire MarketUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Mesilla Valley Mall Co. v. Crown IndustriesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  5. J.M. Gebauer, Inc. v. American Samoa Power AuthorityHigh Court of American Samoa · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API