Legal Opinion
Noonan v. Gilbert
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 2, 1934No. 5910PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Writ of error to the Municipal Court of the District.
Plaintiff (defendant in error) brought suit in the court below claiming a balance due on a contract for professional services. The amended declaration alleges that plaintiff was retained as counsel by the defendant (plaintiff in error) “to appear before the Public Utilities Commission and any Congressional committees holding hearings as to merger or fare increase by the street railways of the District of Columbia, * * * and was by argument and the production of data and evidence before the Public Utilities Commission…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Marshall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Tool Co. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Hazelton v. SheckellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- n.sidney Nyhus v. Travel Management CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Stearns v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
- Brown v. Gesellschaft Fur Drahtlose Telegraphie, M. B. H.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Rumely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Le John Manufacturing Company v. Dwight Webb, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.