Legal Opinion

Larson v. Bath

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 30, 1990No. 65,073PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Elliott, J.:

Wayne C. Larson appeals the summary judgment in favor of Continental Insurance Company (Continental), which denied Larson’s claim for underinsured motorist coverage for an accident.

We reverse.

The facts are essentially uncontroverted. Larson was involved in an auto accident with another vehicle driven by Shawn Bath, a minor. Larson was driving a vehicle owned by his employer, Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company (Katy), and was acting within the scope of his employment, Continental insured the Katy vehicle.

Katy’s agent, Mel Compton, negotiated the coverage and purchase of Katy’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roger v. Estate of MoultonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  2. Van Hoozer v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. Johnson v. Concord Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Employers Casualty Co. v. SloanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Pechtel v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  2. McTaggart v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  3. Ridgway v. Shelter Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996
  4. Crutcher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1999
  5. Phillips v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API