Legal Opinion

Roger v. Estate of Moulton

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 19, 1987No. 86-C-2266PublishedCited by 200 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

513 So.2d 1126 (1987)

Donald ROGER

v.

The ESTATE OF Tad MOULTON, et al.

No. 86-C-2266.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 18, 1987.

Rehearing Granted June 24, 1987.

On Rehearing October 19, 1987.

Mack Barham, Gail Nick, Barham & Churchill, Robert Keaty, Keaty & Keaty, for applicant.

Craig Marks, Jeansonne & Briney, Raymond Jackson, III, Allen, Gooch, Bourgeois, Gregory Moroux, Voorhies & Labb, for respondents.

COLE, Justice.

The primary issue in this case is whether or not there was a valid rejection of uninsured motorist (UM) coverage. The Court of Appeal found there was a valid rejection.[1] We reverse.

The…

Also in this document: Dissent · Lemmon; Dissent · Calogero; Dissent · Lemmon.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Jordan v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  3. Hoefly v. Government Employees Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  4. Sinitiere v. LavergneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  5. Federal Energy Administration v. Algonquin SNG, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by200 opinions

  1. Duncan v. USAA Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  2. Magnon v. CollinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  3. Segura v. FrankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  4. Tugwell v. State Farm Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  5. Gray v. American Nat. Property & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008

195 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API