Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Garcia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 27, 2005No. 46 EAP 2004PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice CAPPY.

This court granted a limited appeal to consider the propriety of the trial court’s decision to give a “no adverse inference” instruction in a multi-defendant case when one defendant requests the instruction and the other defendant requests that the instruction not be given.1 The Superior Court concluded that the trial court should give the instruction under these circumstances. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm.

Appellant, Miguel Garcia, and his co-defendant at trial, Antonio Lambert, were arrested and charged in relation to the killing of Mary Edmond.2…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Carter v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Lakeside v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. PressleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Lucas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LeskoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. Thoeun ThaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. TobySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API