Commonwealth v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
902 A.2d 430 (2006)
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee,
v.
Wayne Cordell MITCHELL, Appellant.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued September 12, 2005.
Decided July 19, 2006.
J. Richard Narvin, Esq., Pittsburgh, for Wayne Cordell Mitchell.
Michael Wayne Streily, Esq., Edward J. Borkowski, Esq., Rebecca Denean Spangler, Esq., Karen T. Edwards, Esq., Amy Zapp, Esq., Pittsburgh, for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
BEFORE: CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and BAER, JJ.
OPINION
Justice BAER.
This is a direct appeal from the judgment of sentence of death[1] imposed following the…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Saylor; Concurrence · Eakin; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Zant v. StephensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jones, J. v. Erie InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022