Kobar Ex Rel Kobar v. Novartis Corp.
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BOLTON, District Judge.
This case arises out of injuries that Plaintiff Rose Lynn Kobar sustained allegedly as a result of ingesting Tavist-D, a drug manufactured by Defendant Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. (“NCH”) containing phenylpropanolamine (“PPA”). At issue is Defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of punitive damages (Doc. 185).
I. BACKGROUND
Tavist-D is a cold, cough and allergy medicine. One of its ingredients is PPA, a decongestant used in hundreds of commercially-available pharmaceuticals, including Dimetapp, Aka-Seltzer Plus and Contac. On April 1, 1979,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sullivan v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- Lofton v. McNeil Consumer & Specialty PharmaceuticalsDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
- In Re: Testosterone Replacement Therapy Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
- Juliana A. Bunting as Personal Representative of the Estate of Kenneth F. Bunting v. AbbVie Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
- Ocasio v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.