Legal Opinion

Cardenas v. Farmers Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 19, 2009No. 051213555, A135642PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Defendant Farmers Insurance Company appeals a supplemental judgment awarding attorney fees to plaintiff, its insured, after plaintiff prevailed in an action for payment of uninsured motorist (UM) benefits. Plaintiff cross-appeals, seeking additional fees. The question before us on appeal is whether a dispute concerning the enforceability of a release is an issue that relates only to “damages”; if so, then defendant qualifies for the “safe harbor” immunity from attorney fees established by ORS 742.061(3), set out below. We hold that such a dispute does not involve only damages. We therefore…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Emerald PUD v. PP & LOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Grisby v. Progressive Preferred InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Grisby v. Progressive Preferred InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. Taylor v. McCollomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kiryuta v. Country Preferred Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Robinson v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Congdon v. BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. Kiryuta v. Country Preferred InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Spearman v. Progressive Classic InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API