Legal Opinion

Grisby v. Progressive Preferred Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 2007No. CC 0305-05057; CA A128089; SC S54196PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBalmer, J.

Plaintiff Omar Grisby prevailed in this action against his insurer for payment of personal injury protection (PIP) benefits. The issue before us is whether plaintiff is entitled to recover his attorney fees. We hold that plaintiffs action comes within the scope of the attorney fee provision for actions on insurance policies, ORS 742.061, and that plaintiff is entitled to recover a reasonable attorney fee from his insurer.

Plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident. He filed a claim for expenses related to his injury with his insurer, defendant Progressive Preferred Insurance Company.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wetherell v. Douglas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Foltz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Grisby v. Progressive Preferred InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Barrett v. BellequeOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Grisby v. Progressive Preferred InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Kiryuta v. Country Preferred Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Robinson v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. Congdon v. BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API