Legal Opinion
FOOTHILL VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSN. v. Bishop
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 5, 1999No. B114533PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.
Introduction
This case involves a condominium complex for which the homeowners association purchased earthquake insurance. The insurer paid more than $2 million for earthquake damage to the complex. Because the complex was severely damaged, the homeowners voted not to rebuild. The issue raised by this appeal is the distribution of the earthquake insurance proceeds. Does the money go to the lender or to the individual owners? Citing this division’s decision in Ziello v. Superior Court (1995) 36 Cal.App.4th 321 [42 Cal.Rptr.2d 251], which held that a lender did not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Yeap v. LeakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Frank Pisano & Associates v. TaggartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Valley Crest Landscape, Inc. v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Ziello v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. TutungiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Martin v. World Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Jem Enterprises v. Washington Mutual BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002