Legal Opinion

Jem Enterprises v. Washington Mutual Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 2002No. B146519PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KITCHING, J.

A property owner and a lender dispute which party had the right to control earthquake insurance proceeds. The trial court concluded that the lender was entitled to control the disbursement of proceeds used to repair the property and granted summary judgment for the lender. Because the owner assigned insurance proceeds to the lender under a deed of trust, the lender had the right to control the disbursement. We therefore affirm the judgment. We address other issues in the unpublished portion of this opinion.

Factual and Procedural Background

1. The Real Property and Deed of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Alexander v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Truck Insurance Exchange v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Ziello v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. SYNGENTA CORP PROTECTION, INC. v. HellikerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Roberts v. LomantoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API