Legal Opinion

Martin v. World Savings & Loan Ass'n

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 2001No. B145688PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*805Opinion

CURRY, J.

In Ziello v. Superior Court (1995) 36 Cal.App.4th 321 [42 Cal.Rptr.2d 251] and Foothill Village Homeowners Assn. v. Bishop (1999) 68 Cal.App.4th 1364 [81 Cal.Rptr.2d 195], this court held that property owners rather than lenders must be allowed to control earthquake insurance proceeds where the pertinent deeds of trust did not require earthquake insurance as a condition for the loans, did not assign the proceeds to the lenders, and did not give the lenders the right to share, control, or direct the proceeds. The present appeal involves a deed of trust that, without requiring…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Wolfe v. State Farm Fire & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Alexander v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Ferro v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Regents of University of California v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Oto, L. L.C. v. KhoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Harris v. TAP Worldwide, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Garcia v. World Savings, FSBCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. In Re Easysaver Rewards LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010
  5. Guidiville Rancheria v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API