SAVANNAH ICE DELIVERY COMPANY v. Ayers
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Stolz, Judge.
This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment overruling the defendant’s motion for judgment n.o.v. and motion for new trial. Held:
1. The first contention by the appellants is that the uncontradicted evidence shows that the plaintiff-appellee could have avoided the collision in question and his resulting personal injuries by the exercise of ordinary care. "It is well-settled law that questions of negligence, diligence, contributory negligence, proximate cause, and the exercise of ordinary care for one’s protection ordinarily are to be decided by a jury, and a court should not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rouse v. FussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Clarke County School District v. MaddenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Gordon v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Anderson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- King v. BrowningSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Stouffer Corp. v. HenkelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- James v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Fountain v. DeKalb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Foskey v. Williams Bros. Trucking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.