James v. Sears, Roebuck & Company
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Stolz, Judge.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff below from a directed verdict for the defendant in a negligence case.
" 'It is well-settled law that questions of negligence, diligence, contributory negligence, proximate cause, and the exercise of ordinary care for one’s protection ordinarily are to be decided by a jury, and a court should not decide them . . . except in plain and indisputable cases.’ [Cits.]” Savannah Ice Delivery Co. v. Ayers, 127 Ga. App. 560, 561 (1) (194 SE2d 330) (1972). "Even where there is no dispute as to the facts, it is, however, usually for the jury to say whether…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wakefield v. AR Winter Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Ellington v. Tolar Consruction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Simmons v. Classic City Beverages, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- SAVANNAH ICE DELIVERY COMPANY v. AyersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Tolar Construction Co. v. EllingtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
3Cited by19 opinions
- Church's Fried Chicken, Inc. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Cunningham v. National Service Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Atkinson v. Kirchoff Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Collins v. McGlamoryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.