King v. Browning
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Clarke, Justice.
The parties to this action are adjoining landowners who dispute the boundary line separating their respective parcels of land. The land owned by the plaintiff (Browning) is bounded on the south by lands owned by all of the defendants and is bounded partially on the north by land owned only by defendant Wilson Lamar King. Browning brought this action seeking to enjoin all of the defendants from alleged encroachments on his land and praying for the establishment of both his north and south lines. A jury trial resulted, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of Browning. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. SaulSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Durden v. KerbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Napier v. LittleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- State Highway Department v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- State Highway Department v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Holloman v. D. R. Horton, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Orkin Exterminating Co. v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Roebuck v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Doctors Hospital of Augusta, Inc. v. BonnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.