Legal Opinion

In Re Caruba

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 29, 1947No. Docket 147/576PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an application to punish for criminal contempt pursuant to Chancery rule 128 (d). The facts have been stipulated and on the day set for the hearing of the cause the defendant pleaded "not guilty."

The defendant is charged with having testified "falsely, deceptively and perjuriously" while under oath as a witness before Augustus C. Studer, Jr., one of the Masters of this court, to whom a reference was made in a cause therein pending for the purpose of supervising certain examinations and inspections by the complainant of books, records, documents, c., in the possession of the defendants…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HudgingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. State Ex Rel. State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  4. People v. GilletteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  5. United States v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. In re DodsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Ong Hing v. ThurstonArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Matter of DanielsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  4. Beesley v. Hartford Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1989
  5. In Re White Motor Credit Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1981

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API