Legal Opinion

Ong Hing v. Thurston

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1966No. 8796PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

This is an original proceeding wherein Robert Ong Hing, hereinafter called petitioner, seeks a writ of certiorari or, in the alternative, a writ of prohibition to prohibit, compel and direct judge Edwin R. Thurston, hereinafter referred to as respondent, from enforcing or in any manner carrying out his order of June 1, 1966, which found petitioner guilty of contempt of court and imposed a fine of $500 to be paid within 48 hours, or be incarcerated in the county jail for fifteen days. After a hearing, we issued an alternative writ of prohibition.

The facts on which the writ was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. United States v. GoldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Van Dyke v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1922

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. Roll and SchollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  2. State v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Horn v. District Court, Ninth Judicial DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Hays v. GamaArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Volk v. BrameCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API