Legal Opinion

Matter of Daniels

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 28, 1990PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

Justice Felix Frankfurter wrote, dissenting in Sacher v. United States, 343 US. 1, 72 S.Ct. 451, 96 L.Ed. 717 (1952):

In administering the criminal law, judges wield the most awesome surgical instruments of society. A criminal trial, it has been well said, should have the atmosphere of the operating room. The presiding judge determines the atmo sphere. He is not an umpire who enforces the rules of a game, or merely a moderator between contestants. If he is adequate to his functions, the moral authority which he radiates will impose the indispensable standards of dignity and austerity upon all…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Robert David Figueroa v. Audrey P. BlackburnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. High Horizons Dev. v. Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  3. In the Matter of the Adoption of N.J.A.C. 5:96 and 5:97 by the New Jersey Council on Affordable HousingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  4. Silverman v. BerksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  5. State v. ByrdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API