Legal Opinion
State v. Crow
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided January 29, 1999No. 79,287PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Larson, J.:
The State of Kansas appeals on a question reserved the trial court’s decision that K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 22-3437 unconstitutionally deprives a criminal defendant of the right to confront witnesses guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 22-3437 allows a report and certificate by the person performing a forensic analysis to be admitted into evidence without testimony if the statutory procedure is followed and the opposing party does not question the conclusions of the report.
Three issues are raised:…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. IvorySupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- State v. LaturnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- State v. KendallSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.