Face v. Hall
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Ingham; Collingwood, J. Bill by Willard H. Face against Eugene H. Hall, Clarence M. Hall, and Blanche R. Mott for cancellation of an exchange of property. From a decree for complainant and in favor of defendant Mott, defendants Hall appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.
The complainant, a resident of the city of Lansing, in February, 1912, desirous of acquiring a business in the city of Charlotte, through the medium of a Mr. Tolbert, a real estate man of the latter place, was introduced to the defendants Eugene H. Hall and Clarence M. Hall, who were the proprietors of a grocery store in that city. After some negotiations, the complainant purchased the property, consisting of a stock of merchandise and fixtures, and paid therefor $7,000. This sum was arrived at by placing a price of $3,500 on the stock of merchandise and $3,500 on the fixtures. The payment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Simar v. . CanadayNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Fred Macey Co. v. MaceyMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Hedin v. Minneapolis Medical & Surgical InstituteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Collins v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Maxted v. FowlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Grand Trunk Western R. Co. v. HW Nelson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Ainscough v. O'SHAUGHNESSEYMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Pound v. ClumMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Zaino v. North Woodward Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Andrews v. OsiusMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.