Legal Opinion

People v. Egan

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 3, 1933No. Docket No. 2342PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.

Defendants were tried before a jury on a joint information charging one Dallas Egan and themselves with the crime of murder. Egan was also charged with four prior convictions and Turcott with one. During the course of the trial Egan changed his plea to “guilty” and the trial proceeded against his co-defendants. The jury returned a verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree as to defendant Rogers, fixing the punishment at life imprisonment with recommendation of leniency. As to Turcott, the jury returned a similar verdict without recommendation of leniency. From the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. YeagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. People v. LapierreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. AmayaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. People v. AguilarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. People v. AquilanteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. People v. EganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API