Legal Opinion

People v. Egan

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 1933No. Docket No. 2441PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Appellant, with two others, was accused of the crime of murder. Appellant Rogers appealed from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. Both the judgment and order were affirmed by decision filed July 3, 1933 (133 Cal. App. 152 [23 Pac. (2d) 1042]), and remittitur was sent down August 3, 1933. On July 31, 1933, pursuant to notice given by appellant, he presented to the superior court a second motion for a new trial, which motion on August 4th was by said court “denied for lack of jurisdiction to entertain or pass upon said motion”. It is from this order…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. PaysenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. People v. EganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. PinedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. People v. CoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Pueblo v. MéndezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947
  4. People v. MéndezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947
  5. People v. PinedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API