Legal Opinion

Lane v. Katt

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 1967No. 32734PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Commissioner.

This suit for injunction and damages arose from a dispute between neighbors over the location of an old boundary-line fence. Plaintiffs got a judgment and the defendants appeal.

The disputed area is a strip 8 feet by 600 feet, flanked by the fence. In the spring of 1963 the defendants cut down a tree in the fence line, tore up part of the fence, and declared their right to move the rest of it. *545Thereupon, the plaintiffs sued for the injunction and damages.

Admittedly, the fence stood on defendants’ land, but plaintiffs relied on a written agreement executed in 1924 by the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ambrose v. M. F. A. Co-Operative Ass'n of St. ElizabethSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Sullivan v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. Gilbert v. MalanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. In Re Alexander's EstateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  5. Repple v. East Texas Motor Freight LinesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Earney v. ClayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Adams v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Boyd v. BoydMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Cole v. ColeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. State v. HendelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API