Legal Opinion

Payne v. St. Louis Grain Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1977No. 38705PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Judge.

A workmen’s compensation ease involving a dispute as to coverage by two insurance carriers. St. Louis Grain Corporation, the employer, was insured by two valid workmen’s compensation policies. One was with Westchester Insurance Company (hereinafter Westchester) which carried workmen’s compensation insurance coverage on any injuries construed to be compen-sable under the Illinois Workmen’s Compensation Act. The other was an assigned risk workmen’s compensation policy with Commercial Union Insurance Company (hereinafter Commercial) for injuries compensable under the Missouri…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation. Celanese Corporation and Fiber Industries, Inc. v. Leesona Corporation, Lex Tex Ltd., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. Thacker v. Massman Const. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. Daggett v. Kansas City Structural Steel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Long v. LincolnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Otis & Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Black v. State of Mo.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1980
  2. Hawkes v. LewisNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Reese v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. Campbell v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Egan v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API