Legal Opinion

Orr v. Ahern

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 6, 1928PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

The plaintiff, a resident of Com necticut, seeks to recover damages for personal injuries alleged in his complaint to have been caused him through the negligent conduct of the defendant administrator’s intestate in the State of New York. The defendant demurred upon the grounds that the action did not survive at common law, and the complaint does not allege that in the State of New York the action survived against the estate of the defendant’s intestate.

The action- is a common-law action for a tort resulting in personal injuries committed in the State of New York; it is a transitory, not a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Meekin v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Needham v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1865
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. JoySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. State v. Pittsburgh & Connellsville Rail RoadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. Grant v. McAuliffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Levy v. Daniels' U-Drive Auto Renting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  4. Schaefer v. O. K. Tool Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  5. Reilly v. Antonio Pepe Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API