Legal Opinion

Arden v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 29, 1925No. 2408PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

Tbe appellant imported alcoholic perfumery in 1923. This was. assessed for duty by the collector at 40 cents per pound and 75 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 62 of the Tariff Act of 1922 and with an additional tax of $1.10 per wine gallon under section 600’ (c) of the revenue act of February 24,1919. On appeal, the Board of General Appraisers sustained the assessment made by the collector.

*43The importer contends the Tariff Act of 1922 has repealed, by implication,-section 600 (c) of the revenue act of February 24, 1919, and this is the single question involved here. It is conceded there…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Murdock v. City of MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. United States v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Red Rock v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1883

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. StoneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Faber, Coe & Gregg (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  3. Nichols Copper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1938
  4. Shaw v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
  5. Westco Liquor, Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API