Westco Liquor, Products Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Concurrence
CONCURRING IN PART
EKWall, Judge:
I agree with the majority decision insofar as it holds that the rate of internal revenue tax applicable .to the wine involved was that imposed by the collector for the reason that the alcoholic content of said wine exceeded 21 per centum by volume. I regret that I am unable to agree with the construction placed by the majority upon section 528 of the Tariff Act of 1930, and the holding that the internal revenue tax here assessed is a customs duty. The law imposing the tax (section 3030, Internal Revenue Code, as amended, 26 U. S. C. sec. 3030, as amended by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Fairbank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- May v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Almy v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.