Stein v. Camden Fibre Mills, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
The plaintiff brought an action of assumpsit to recover the sum of $1571.04 with interest from July 1, 1940. In his statement of claim he alleged that he is the assignee of Chung Shing Company of Shanghai, China, of all its claims against the defendant by virtue of an agreement wherein that company consented to sell, and the defendant agreed to buy, 300 bales of cotton. A written memorandum addressed to defendant dated February 16, 1940, “Contract No. 6135,” attached to the plaintiff’s claim, states that ,it is confirming the sale of ,100 bales of “Picker Waste”…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. HowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Mason-Heflin Coal Co. v. CurrieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Manufacturers Light & Heat Co. v. LampSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. LippincottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Vitro Manufacturing Co. v. Standard Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Target Sportswear, Inc. v. Clearfield FoundationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Brister & Koester Lumber Corp. v. American Lumber Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Williams v. StewartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- García Gómez v. Comisión IndustrialSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
- Sall v. Mueller Brass Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.