Legal Opinion

Sall v. Mueller Brass Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1949No. Appeal, 263PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

The question presented is whether or not, in a proceeding of foreign attachment in assumpsit, the averments in plaintiffs’ complaint come within the provisions of Section 4 of the Pennsylvania Sales Act of May 19, 1915, P. L. 543; 69 PS, 42 which provides as follows: “A contract to sell or a sale of any goods . . . shall not be enforceable by action unless . . . some note or memorandum in writing of the contract or sale be signed by the party to be charged. . '. .” The court below sustained preliminary objections to the complaint in the nature of a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. HowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Manufacturers Light & Heat Co. v. LampSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. LippincottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Vitro Manufacturing Co. v. Standard Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Byrne's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Downingtown Industrial & Agricultural School v. Pa. Dept. of Education (In Re Downingtown Industrial & Agricultural School)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Linsker v. Savings of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. North Jersey Sales & Construction Co. v. Emerman Erie Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API