Legal Opinion

State v. Hemond

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 2, 2005No. 03-329PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Defendant appeals a district court judgment convicting him, after a jury trial, of operating a motor vehicle in a grossly negligent manner with serious injury resulting, in violation of 23 V.S.A. § 1091(b). Defendant presses three arguments on appeal: (1) the trial court’s exclusion of his exculpatory written statement to the police on the day of the incident violated his right to present evidence and the rule of completeness; (2) the prosecutor’s statement during closing arguments that the outcome of the case would have no bearing on complainant’s pending civil case against defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. FrancisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  2. State v. AyersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  3. State v. MessierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  4. State v. HemingwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  5. State v. LawtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. DesautelsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  2. State v. John DiscolaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  3. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  4. State v. Matthew WebsterSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  5. Loiselle v. BarsalowSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API