Legal Opinion

State v. Ayers

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 11, 1987No. 85-039PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction, after a jury trial, of careless and negligent operation of a motor vehicle in violation of 23 V.S.A. § 1091(a). Defendant raises two issues on appeal: whether certain hearsay evidence was admitted improperly and whether statements of the prosecutor made in closing argument were so prejudicial as to require a new trial. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

The incident giving rise to the conviction arose out of a marital dispute. At the time, defendant and his wife were living separately, with two of their daughters residing with defendant and the other with…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. State v. BaileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  4. State v. LaphamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  5. State v. RamsaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. EnglandWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. FrancisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  3. Varnum v. VarnumSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. State v. WoolSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  5. Deyo v. KinleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1989

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API