Loiselle v. Barsalow
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. This interlocutory appeal turns on whether defendantappellee New Hampshire Indemnity Company (insurer) properly provided notice to its insured, plaintiff Tamie Loiselle, of the cancellation of plaintiff’s automobile insurance policy under 8 V.S.A. §§ 4224(a) and 4226. The trial court held that insurer did comply with the statutes and granted summary judgment in insurer’s favor. We affirm and remand.
¶ 2. Plaintiff purchased automobile insurance from insurer through defendant-appellant Barsalow Insurance Agency (Barsalow) beginning in July 1998. The parties agree that insurer attempted to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Residential Holding Corp. v. Scottsdale InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- USGen New England, Inc. v. Town of RockinghamSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Hardwick Recycling & Salvage, Inc. v. Acadia InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Rocque v. Co-Op. Fire Ins. Ass'n of Vt.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- Chittenden v. Waterbury Center Community Church, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kapusta v. Department of Health/Risk ManagementSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Lee v. AIG Casualty Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- All Star Group, LLC Subdivision Permit Denial - Decision on Motion (Summary Judgment)Vermont Superior Court · 2021
- Dodge Farm Community, LLC Concept PlanVermont Superior Court · 2008
- Gould Accessory Dwelling ApplicationVermont Superior Court · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.