Legal Opinion

Loiselle v. Barsalow

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 26, 2006No. 05-149PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. This interlocutory appeal turns on whether defendantappellee New Hampshire Indemnity Company (insurer) properly provided notice to its insured, plaintiff Tamie Loiselle, of the cancellation of plaintiff’s automobile insurance policy under 8 V.S.A. §§ 4224(a) and 4226. The trial court held that insurer did comply with the statutes and granted summary judgment in insurer’s favor. We affirm and remand.

¶ 2. Plaintiff purchased automobile insurance from insurer through defendant-appellant Barsalow Insurance Agency (Barsalow) beginning in July 1998. The parties agree that insurer attempted to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Residential Holding Corp. v. Scottsdale InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. USGen New England, Inc. v. Town of RockinghamSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  3. Hardwick Recycling & Salvage, Inc. v. Acadia InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  4. Rocque v. Co-Op. Fire Ins. Ass'n of Vt.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  5. Chittenden v. Waterbury Center Community Church, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kapusta v. Department of Health/Risk ManagementSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  2. Lee v. AIG Casualty Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
  3. All Star Group, LLC Subdivision Permit Denial - Decision on Motion (Summary Judgment)Vermont Superior Court · 2021
  4. Dodge Farm Community, LLC Concept PlanVermont Superior Court · 2008
  5. Gould Accessory Dwelling ApplicationVermont Superior Court · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API