United States v. Gurczynski
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court
Judge RYAN
delivered the opinion of the Court.
It is unlikely that the Government would argue it is constitutionally reasonable to search a home based on a warrant previously issued for a crime the homeowner had already been convicted of, and to also direct the searchers to look for evidence of offenses not named in the warrant. In this case, however, the Government asserts the right to do just that, but for a portable hard drive (thumb drive) rather than a home. We recognize the differences between a home and a thumb drive and the unique challenges in applying the Fourth Amendment in a digital…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Randolph v. HV and United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
- People of Michigan v. Kristopher Allen HughesMichigan Supreme Court · 2020
- United States v. EppesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018
- United States v. EppesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018
- United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.