Legal Opinion

People v. Allen

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided January 18, 1996PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Howard A. Ruditzky, J.

Defendant Gino Allen charged with petit larceny (Penal Law § 155.25) and criminal impersonation in the second degree *917(Penal Law § 190.25 [1]) moves to dismiss the instant accusatory instrument pursuant to CPL 170.30 and 170.35. The defendant’s motion is denied.

In the case at bar, an interpreter assisted the complainant in providing the allegations contained in the misdemeanor complaint. The complainant then signed the corroborating affidavit which stated, under penalties of perjury, that he read the accusatory instrument (the misdemeanor complaint)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. BorreroNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. In re Edward B.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. People v. WhetsonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1987
  5. People v. GuzmanCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re Shaquana S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. People v. CamachoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2000
  3. People v. StridironCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1997
  4. People v. BanchsCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1997
  5. People v. FloresCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API