Legal Opinion
In re Edward B.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 16, 1992PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Titone, J.
In Matter of David T. (75 NY2d 927), we held that a juvenile delinquency petition that is supported in relevant part only by hearsay is jurisdictionally defective and must be dismissed because it does not meet the requirements of Family Court Act § 311.2 (3). The issue presented here is whether a similar defect in a juvenile delinquency petition constitutes a *461basis for dismissal when the hearsay character of the facts alleged in the supporting deposition is not facially apparent but is discovered at some point in the course of the proceeding. Under such…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- In re David T.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. PhillipeCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1989
- People v. PierreCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1988
- In re ParksNew York City Family Court · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- People v. CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Matter of Rodney J.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Matter of Neftali D.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. HolmesNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Matter of Michael M.New York Court of Appeals · 2004
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.