Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
In reply to this petitioner’s argument that the judgment in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, wherein Vincent was awarded compensation, was contrary to “the only basis authorized by the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Alabama,” the Court of Appeals has merely stated that the finding of fact by the said trial court in that case was in accordance with subdivision (c) of section 7551, Code of 1923.
Petitioner insists it has a right to attack the judgment awarding compensation to Vincent (citing Blumberg v. Abbott, 159 Tenn. 586, 21 S.W.2d 396), and that by mathematical…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Enrico v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Allen Water Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Birmingham Electric Co. v. HerefordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Blumberg v. AbbottTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
- Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1941