Legal Opinion

McQuown v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 24, 2003PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

Cynthia L. McQuown (Claimant), representing herself, petitions for review from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirming the denial of her request for additional extended Trade Readjustment Assistance (TRA) benefits under Section 233 of the Trade Act of 1974 (Trade Act), 19 U.S.C. § 2293. 1 Agreeing Claimant is not entitled to additional extended TRA benefits because she exhausted her 52 weeks of eligibility, we affirm.

Claimant was employed by Osram Syl-vania, Inc. (Employer), and her last day of work was November 18, 2000. Following…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sturni v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Wilkinson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Burnett v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lowe v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Chiccitt v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Daman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Glover v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Hall v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API