Legal Opinion

Daman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge COHN.

In this appeal, we are asked to decide the eligibility for temporary, extended unemployment compensation (TEUC) benefits of a teacher who, although he had a balance remaining on his regular unemployment compensation benefits, could not collect them because of the prohibition in Section 402.1 of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law), Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex.Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. § 802.1, added by Section 5 of the Act of July 6, 1977, P.L. 41.

The basic facts are undisputed, but the record is extremely sparse, making the procedural history…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McQuown v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Zimmerman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Stine v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Glover v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. M.A. Williams v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API