Legal Opinion

State v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 5, 2001No. 45622-9-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgid, C.J.

Herbert Richardson appeals the trial court’s imposition of costs after a jury found him guilty of assault in the fourth degree. We hold that because the court’s order imposing costs was based solely on Richardson’s decision to go to trial rather than accepting the State’s plea offer, it was improper and we reverse it.

FACTS

Richardson was charged with attempted rape in the second degree, in violation of RCW 9A.28.020 and RCW 9A.44.050(l)(a). After plea negotiations failed on the day the case was set for trial, the State moved to amend the information to add alternative counts of assault in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  2. State v. HartzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  3. State v. SandeferCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State of Washington v. Lonnie Lee PrzespolewskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  2. State v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API