Legal Opinion

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 12, 1910No. 1144PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Corporation Commission. From an order of the Corporation Commission, the St; Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

The order appealed from runs in the alternative. By it appellant is required by the Corporation Commission to stop on flag its interstate passenger trains Nos. 5 and 6 at Cameron — that is, No. 5 going south about 10 o’clock a. m. and No. 6 going north about 5 p. m. — or restore the schedule of interstate trains Nos. 11 and 12, which, until a short time theretofore, by order of the commission stopped at Cameron going south about 8 o’clock a. m. and returning stopped again at 4 :25 p. m. Only two witnesses testified at the hearing — one a resident of Cameron, the other appellant’s division…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Town of WitcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Town of NorfolkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Seward v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Kurn v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. PollardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API