Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Town of Norfolk
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Appeal from the Corporation Commission. The Missouri, Kansas & Texas Eailway Company was , required by the Corporation Commission to stop certain trains at the town of Norfolk, and appeals from the order. Citing: Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Illinois, 163 TJ. S. 142; Atlantic C. L. R. Co. v. Wharton, 207 TJ. S. 328; Miss. Railroad Com. v. Illinois Cent. R. Co., 203 TJ. S. 335; Cleveland, etc., R. Co. v. Illinois, 177 TJ. S. 514. Citing: State -v. Gladson, 57 Minn. 585, 166 TJ.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Corporation Commission. The Missouri, Kansas & Texas Eailway Company was , required by the Corporation Commission to stop certain trains at the town of Norfolk, and appeals from the order. Citing: Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Illinois, 163 TJ. S. 142; Atlantic C. L. R. Co. v. Wharton, 207 TJ. S. 328; Miss. Railroad Com. v. Illinois Cent. R. Co., 203 TJ. S. 335; Cleveland, etc., R. Co. v. Illinois, 177 TJ. S. 514. Citing: State -v. Gladson, 57 Minn. 585, 166 TJ. S. 427; State v. New Haven & N. Co., 43 Conn. 351, 104 TJ. S. 1; L. <& A. R. Co. V. State, 85 Ark. 12; Laheshore & M. S.…
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The appellant railway. company was required by the Corporation Commission to stop its two fast, through trains Nos. 21 and 22,. known as “The Flyer,” at Norfolk, a station on its line between Oklahoma City and Parsons, Kan. The Atchi-son, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Company also has a line at said station paralleling appellant’s line a considerable distance. Certain passenger trains over the latter line, one going north in the morning about 5:45 and south in the evening at about 9 :35, and also a local freight daily, both ways, except Sunday, carrying passengers, stop at said station. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Smith v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Stone v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Covington & Lexington Turnpike Road Co. v. SandfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Hennington v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Public Utilities Commission ex rel. City of Springfield v. Springfield Gas & Electric Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
- Kurn v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Town of WitcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Town of TroySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.