Legal Opinion

Berger v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 8, 1991No. 90-1030PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Kerry Berger appeals from his conviction of the offense referred to as driving while under the influence of liquor, D.C.Code § 40-716(b) (1990), on the ground that the government failed to prove that he was guilty of the offense charged in the information. We affirm.

I

Appellant was charged by information with violating D.C.Code § 40-716(b)(l) (1990), which makes it illegal to “operate or be in physical control of any vehicle” while “under the influence of intoxicating li-quor_” At a bench trial the government presented one witness, Officer Wallace Carmichael, who testified that he…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ingram v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Scutchings v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Carr v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Byrd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Cain v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Burgess v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Bell v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. ANTHONY BELL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Josue Lopez Ambrocio v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API