Berger v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Appellant Kerry Berger appeals from his conviction of the offense referred to as driving while under the influence of liquor, D.C.Code § 40-716(b) (1990), on the ground that the government failed to prove that he was guilty of the offense charged in the information. We affirm.
I
Appellant was charged by information with violating D.C.Code § 40-716(b)(l) (1990), which makes it illegal to “operate or be in physical control of any vehicle” while “under the influence of intoxicating li-quor_” At a bench trial the government presented one witness, Officer Wallace Carmichael, who testified that he…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ingram v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Scutchings v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Carr v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Byrd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Cain v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Atkinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Burgess v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Bell v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- ANTHONY BELL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Josue Lopez Ambrocio v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.