Legal Opinion
Burgess v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 22, 1996No. 95-CM-1352PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
Appellant Burgess was convicted of assault 1 and destruction of property, 2 both misdemeanors, after a non-jury trial. On appeal from those convictions, he contends on various grounds that he was denied his constitutional right to a trial by jury. This court en banc, in an opinion issued today, has rejected his principal constitutional argument and has referred the remaining issues presented on appeal to this panel of the court, chosen by lot in the usual manner. Burgess v. United States, 680 A.2d 1033 (D.C.1996) (en banc). After hearing further argument, we reject the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. McLaughlin, RicoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Murrell v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2010
- District of Columbia v. GallagherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Robert Lee Parrish v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Lennon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.