Floyd v. Integon General Insurance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WYNN, Judge.
This appeal presents us with two narrow questions of law: (1) Can an insured under a motor vehicle liability policy in North Carolina “use” more than one insured vehicle at a given time? and (2) Does North Carolina’s Financial Responsibility Act, embodied in Article 9A of Chapter 20 in the General Statutes, N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 20-279.1 et seq. (2001), prevent motor vehicle liability insurers from placing limits on their liability regardless of the number of insureds or insured vehicles involved, or the number of claims made? Based on our existing case law, we are compelled to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Capital Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Meachan v. Montgomery County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Whisnant v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Wilmoth v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Geitner Ex Rel. Southern Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Geitner Ex Rel. Southern Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007