Legal Opinion

Geitner Ex Rel. Southern Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Mullins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 2007No. COA06-547Published

1Opinion of the Court

643 S.E.2d 435 (2007)

Diane GEITNER, Individually and derivatively on behalf of Southern Hosiery Mills, Incorporated, and Jacques Geitner, Individually and derivatively on behalf of Southern Hosiery Mills, Incorporated, Plaintiffs,

v.

Martha MULLINS, Virginia Shehan, Peter Menzies, Martha Mullins as Administratrix of the Estate of Phillip A. Mullins, III, and Southern Hosiery Mills, Incorporated, Defendants.

No. COA06-547.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 17, 2007.

Robert J. King, III, and Janice L. Kopec, Greensboro, for plaintiffs-appellants.

McDaniel & Anderson, LLP, by L. Bruce McDaniel,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fulton v. TalbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Union Carbide Corp. v. OffermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Smith v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
  4. Resolution Trust Corp. v. DeanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1994
  5. McCabe v. DawkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API