Legal Opinion

Whisnant v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1965No. 40PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, C.J.

The primary question presented for determination is whether or not under the facts in this case the court below committed reversible error in sustaining defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit.

In the case of Katz v. Ocean Acc. & Guarantee Corp.., Ltd., 112 N.Y.S. 2d 737, the plaintiff’s wife had parked the plaintiff’s automobile in front of their home. The driver’s seat, where the plaintiff’s wife had been seated, was toward the center of the roadway. She alighted from the automobile and was in the act of locking the car with her hand upon the door, when suddenly perceiving an oncoming…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Madden v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Wolf v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, PennsylvaniaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  3. Lokos v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1949
  4. Sherman v. New York Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1951
  5. B'ham Ry. L. & P. Co. v. GlennSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Westerfield v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  2. Adkins v. MeadorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Cocking v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  5. Raines v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API