Geitner Ex Rel. Southern Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Mullins
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
TYSON, Judge.
Diane and Jacques Geitner, individually, and on behalf of Southern Hosiery Mills, Incorporated (“SHM”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) appeal from orders entered denying plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment and granting Martha Mullins, individually and as executrix of the Estate of Phillip A. Mullins, III (“the Estate”), Virginia Shehan, Peter Menzies, and SHM’s (collectively, “defendants”) motions for summary judgment regarding plaintiffs’ declaratory judgment action and derivative action. We affirm.
I. Background
SHM is a closely held corporation founded in approximately 1945 by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Union Carbide Corp. v. OffermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
- Smith v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. DeanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1994
- In re Estate of MullinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re Estate of MullinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Self-Help Ventures Fund v. Custom Finish, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- McDowell v. Randolph CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Cedar Greene, LLC v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Holland v. Buck Mountain Prop. Owners Ass'n, Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.