Legal Opinion
Thomas Pereira v. U.S. Postal Service Judith Wolfe Ernie Molina Tom Regan Frank Smith
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 29, 1990No. 89-15055PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FACTS
Pereira, a letter carrier for the U.S. Postal Service, filed this action alleging he was harassed by his supervisors because of his activities associated with his candidacy for a position on the Santa Clara California City Council. Pereira contends he was harassed for allegedly abusing sick leave, was instructed not to take his lunch more than one-half mile from his letter carrier route, and was ordered (along with other letter carriers) not to talk on the work room floor. Pereira contends that all of these actions were taken to retaliate against him for exercising his First…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Loeffler v. FrankSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rush v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1990
- Meyer v. Fidelity SavingsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Pereira v. U.S. Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Brandofino v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1998
- Meyer v. Fidelity SavingsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991